.png)
How to write MYP Maths Criterion B Assessments - Tips and Examples
Updated: Aug 17, 2024
Overview
Criterion B is all about investigating patterns. A summary of the steps are:
• Do the maths (the steps may be given or the student needs to select their own method to achieve higher levels)
• Identify patterns (how one result ties to another)
• Write a general rule (should clearly define how any value could produce the final result)
• Check that the rule works (the result from their rule should be the same result from applying a predetermined process - normally the "do" part in step 1)
• Explain why the rule works (MYP2/3)
• Prove that the rule will always work with any value, within the boundaries of their rule (an option in MYP4/5)
Tips
Where possible, try to avoid investigating into rules that lead to standard rules or formulae (e.g. area of a triangle = base x height/2). It is possible that some students will have seen these rules before and therefore you will not be assessing their investigative skills.
Useful starting points:
Investigate yourself! You can be really creative by playing with the content and understanding delivered each lesson. Practise what you preach and inquire - what happens if…? Why? How can I guide my students to discover this?
Nrich has some great investigations which you can rewrite to work well within your unit. https://nrich.maths.org/curriculum-secondary
Games and puzzles often have lots of patterns within them which could be developed into investigations. Here are some useful websites: http://think-maths.co.uk/maths-puzzles https://www.mathsisfun.com/puzzles/, https://www.transum.org/Software/Puzzles/ , https://www.openmiddle.com/category/grade-7/the-number-system-grade-7/ (will need to be structured more to lead to a rule rather than an open investigation)
Don’t be afraid to introduce something new. As long as you clearly define anything new, and it doesn’t require any additional mathematical knowledge, this can be a really beneficial tool. Explore the enrichment section of the mathematics framework on the new maths guide.
Layout
A simple format to follow would be to have a two part assessment.
The first part will be structured, with more support at the beginning to help students spot patterns and steps given so the student only needs to apply the given investigative process. In this part ask students to predict and spot patterns. Students can develop this into a general rule (MYP2 and above) or suggest relationships which they then verify (MYP1).
The second part will require students to select their own investigative process allowing students who tackle this to aim for the higher levels (7 - 8 in MYP1 and 5 - 8 in MYP2 and above).
Examples
View this free task, complete with assessment rubric, sample student answer and marking guidelines.
For further guidance, and 10 thorough examples, you can purchase this handy e-book or the individual assessments.
Thinking about following curiosity through everyday information, I find the smaller practical questions more interesting than a quick conclusion. A clear question can turn a casual interest into something easier to explore. It is the kind of question I would keep in mind when thinking about 2welve and 2welve learning ideas. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. How do you decide which detail deserves a closer look before moving on?
I keep coming back to the everyday side of exploring scientific questions through clear examples, where a simple detail can lead to a wider question. A useful explanation shows how an observation connects with the question being investigated. That practical perspective helps me frame science learning ideas as a theme for Stemcellwanglab. It leaves me curious about the steps between understanding an idea and putting it into practice. What simple comparison would help someone understand why a result matters?
I like thinking about communicating ideas to the right audience through small observations rather than trying to reach a conclusion immediately. A clear explanation of a practical benefit can be more useful than a string of enthusiastic claims. I would connect Seamonstermarketing with digital marketing ideas through an ordinary example rather than a broad claim. That is the part I would keep thinking about after moving on to something else. What would make a short message feel relevant rather than intrusive?
What interests me about building confidence through manageable learning goals is how a broad idea becomes part of an ordinary day. A clear first step can make a difficult subject feel more approachable. It is the kind of question I would keep in mind when thinking about Practicalresources and practical learning skills. That is the part I would keep thinking about after moving on to something else. How do you decide what to practise when a topic initially seems too broad?
I like thinking about following curiosity through everyday information through small observations rather than trying to reach a conclusion immediately. A clear question can turn a casual interest into something easier to explore. It is the kind of question I would keep in mind when thinking about Neshawonderland and Neshawonderland learning ideas. I am still thinking through the practical side, because the context can change what seems useful. How do you decide which detail deserves a closer look before moving on?